May 20, 2012

Michigan Education Budget News and Resources

Title page to Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning...

Image via Wikipedia

There is a lot of curiosity and even fear about what might be ahead for Michigan public schools and their dramatically shrinking budgets.

I’ve been ask many questions about our local Flat Rock Community Schools plan. My general thinking is supportive of Flat Rock School Board President Norm Haase’s recent letter to the Flat Rock Community [PDF] and I added some of my own thoughts on the Flat Rock school budget yesterday.

However, I thought it might be helpful to share some of the news and resources I follow, outside of our internal Flat Rock School Board budget review process. Take a look and what I read to shape my opinion (In addition to your input, of course). If you know of others please leave a comment and reference below.

Education Websites I Frequent

Recent Reports & Studies I Have Read

Recent News from State & Other School Districts

State Legislation I’m Watching

  • SB 1046 – Requiring employers to pay no more than 80% of health insurance premiums
  • SB 1047 – Allowing for the creation of a state employee health plan
  • SB 1073 – Reducing administrative costs to no more than 28% for school districts
  • SB 1074 – Requiring mandatory competitive bidding

The information is a little overwhelming, but at the same time it is nice that we are not having to make these difficult decisions alone. I will continue to keep on top of what others are recommending and doing—making every attempt to guide us down the best long-term path for Flat Rock Community Schools.

Share

Flat Rock School Board Budget Process

Before reading the rest of this post I encourage you to pause and read the “official” letter from the School Board President, addressed to Flat Rock Community on these matters. Then come back and read my “unofficial” commentary.

I’m probably not enlightening anyone when I say Michigan is in unprecedented economic times. As you can see in the graph to the right our unemployment rate (compared to the US average) alone tells most of the tale.

This simple economic factor alone impacts every aspect of Michigan life—including our education system.

I get a lot more phone calls and emails these days. And I’m grateful for your trust in electing me to the School Board and your diligence in holding my feet to the fire for my promised transparency.

Having said that, I want to give you a little more information. I want to give you a better picture of the budget process the Flat Rock School Board is currently moving through; better insight into what it takes to get to a State mandated balanced budget for the 2010/2011 school year.

Michigan Public School Budget Basics

Lets begin with the fundamentals that drive a Michigan public schools’ operating budget.

First, there is revenue. Unlike many States, very little of our revenue is derived from local property taxes. This was the result of 1994 legislation that changed the way Michigan education is funded, often referenced as Prop A. The wisdom of this change is still debated today (see “Are Schools Underfunded?”).

Regardless of the politics, the facts of the matter is that nearly 83% of school funding is derived from sources directly linked to personal or discretionary income (re-reference the unemployment graph above). Here are some rough numbers that made up the 2008 School Aid State revenue, which is 78% of how Flat Community Schools funds operations (revenue sources):

  • Sales and Use Tax (42%)
  • Income Tax (19%)
  • State Education Tax (16%)
  • Lottery Profits (6%)

This closer look at where our educational dollars come from probably makes the $337 per pupil reduction in State funding less surprising.

One last note on revenue: As for all the promises of Federal money to save local schools, only 8% of our projected 2010-2011 school budget is expected to originate from Federal sources. Even President Obama’s “Race to the Top” education life preserver is only projected to contribute $119,000 to the Flat Rock schools budget (a long way from $1.15 million gap we need to close)—and that assumes Michigan qualifies for the special funding.

Now let’s move to the expense side of the budget.

Most of our expenses go directly to the core instruction of students (as it should be) in Flat Rock Community Schools, approximately 68%.

Sliced another way 81% of our budget is paid towards wages and benefits, which are primarily “locked in” expenses in accordance with various collective bargaining agreements.

With these high-level numbers you can see the challenges ahead in balancing this budget. We have been asked to balance a $17.9 million budget with a $1.15 million short-fall.

Flat Rock Community Schools Budget Process

This brings you up to speed with the budget environment and the constraints in which the the School Board is operating. Now I want to talk about our budgeting process.

I’ll start with a bit of an apology. Like I mentioned in my opening paragraph, these are “unprecedented economic times.” This the first time Flat Rock or this School Board has been handed a budget shortfall this significant. As we have embarked on this unique task we have stumbled in clearly communicating and getting every stakeholder notified. We continue to work on learning from our mistakes and improving this process.

However, here are several things we have done thus far to make sure you are part of the process and that help equip each School Board member with a deep understanding of the budget. We have over the last several weeks:

  • Conducted community and school employee surveys
  • Held two special open School Board work-study sessions
  • Held one special closed School Board session to review collective bargaining agreements
  • Each Board member has actively done personal due diligence with constituents and stakeholders

This process has given the School Board valuable insight into the most critical components of preserving Flat Community Schools high quality of education and guiding us to where we need to proceed for expense reduction.

I know this process seems slow and frustrating, but it’s important that we proceed in a prudent way. Doing this right now will make all the difference in our children’s future.

What’s Next?

I’d like to tell that we’re done, but we’re not. No final decisions have been made, but a very specific path has been laid by the School Board and communicated to the Administration.

At the next regularly scheduled School Board meeting (next Monday, 2/8 at 7:00 pm in the Community Building) we will take another step in gathering additional numbers. Specifically, we will seek to gather comparisons with our current operating methods and begin the process of working with our collective bargaining units.

What’s most important are the guiding principles that were outlined by our School Board President, Norm Haase:

“We each realize that our purpose is to educate our children. This education involves not only the core classroom subjects, but also the other activities that help them develop in the great citizens we need them to be.”

and

“[Our goal is that]…our students will not even notice that we have made cuts.”

In the end, I hope that you know we are working hard and carefully to make the best decisions for your children and the community of Flat Rock, MI.

As always, never hesitate to contact me with questions or thoughts—I represent you!

Share

Gov. Granholm Takes More Away from Education, $292 Per Student Cut

Senior Member of Flat Rock RotaryI will make a quick update now so you have the basic information. I will update later with more commentary and details as this might (still not a done deal) impact Flat Rock Schools.

Gov. Granholm took her pen to the State budget and slashed another $212 million from the school aid fund. This will translate into a $292 per student cut, up from the legislative proposed budget cut of $165 per pupil.

That means, doing some estimates based on the reported count day numbers and public Flat Rock Community Schools 2009-2010 budget resolutions:

  • 1,902 student x $292 = $555,384 reduction in “State Sources,” which is
  • $555,384 / $17,665,992 = 3% reduction in “Total Revenues”

Read the latest on Michigan State Budget:

Share

Flat Rock School Board Recap (10/12)

Bill Rice School Board IconDashing from the Simpson Middle School Parent meeting to the Board of Education meeting, my night of Flat Rock Community Schools continued.

Flat Rock Community Schools Audit

The first item on the agenda was the presentation by the independent auditor–Rehmann Robson. It was a bit hard to follow without a copy of the audit report, but the auditor generally reported the following:

  • The finances and accounting processes were in “good order”
  • Fund balances across the board (consistent with all districts) were down significantly
  • All fund balances continue to be positive
  • A significant amount of long-term debt was able to be paid down last year (atypical to other districts and a good thing)
  • Bond funds are audited yearly and are being managed appropriately
  • A significant decline in fund balances were the result of MI tax tribunal protests (when people or businesses protest and have their property taxes lowered)

Public Comments

There were only three public comments last night. One was a question as to when the Title I programs would begin, which Superintendent Russ Pickell addressed. These programs will begin after MEAP testing, underway starting today. Up until this point most of the classroom instruction has been devoted to MEAP preparation.

The second and third question were related. They were two Flat Rock Community School alumnus and former band members showing support for Flat Rock Band Director Jim Engelbert. Apparently there was an incident, the details and facts were not discussion, at a recent band performance in Trenton.

Meet the Candidate Night

The Meet the Candidate Night has been changed from October 20th to October 27th at 6:00 p.m. This will be your opportunity to meet all of the candidates running for the Board of Education. We will be answering questions written by the President of the Board of Education and the District Superintendent as well as questions from the audience.

Sign-up for updates via via email or RSS feed.

Share

Coffee with Michigan State Representative Deb Kennedy

I spent this morning having coffee with our State Representative Deb Kennedy. She hosts a monthly coffee at the Flat Rock Cafe. I think it’s a great idea for updating us on her activities in Lansing and listening to issues that are important to her constituents.

The talk, as you can imagine, was all about the Michigan budget. The Legislature has approved a school funding bill that somewhat softens the original shock of $218 per student, to $165 per student.

This dodges the bullet of most school districts trying to figure out how to cover operating expenses without the October 20th payments. However, it still means a substantial cut in already thin school budgets.

Rep. Kennedy did not have much consolation for our educational funding woes, but at least she is getting out and talking with us.

She also surveyed the coffee clutch about the proposed initiative to add State revenue with a new permit that allows bars to stay open until 4 a.m. (currently 2 a.m.) and allow merchants to sell alcohol as early as 7 a.m., including Sundays for $1500. This legislation is intended to raise State revenues and would be used to help fund the, currently out of the budget, Michigan Promise Scholarship.

The general consensus was that like State Lotteries there is little assurance that it would directly fund education and significant unfunded public services expense (i.e., law enforcement and emergency medical services) would likely transfer to local municipalities.

Again, I thought this was a great opportunity to visit with our State Representative and meet other concerned citizens from Flat Rock and surrounding Downriver communities.

Thanks for visiting with us, Deb!

Here are some recent articles covering the Michigan budget debate, as it applies to funding education:

Sign-up for updates via via email or RSS feed.

Share

Michigan Budget Update: Education Funding Still in Jeopardy

Michigan Education v. PoliticsMichigan is still without a viable balanced budget. However, the State only shut-down briefly before a continuation was past. A mixed blessing?

This debate and process is certain to be the single biggest impact to your children’s education in the next several years. Why?

You probably already know that K-12 public education is in the cross-hairs to take a $218 per pupil cut. However, what you might not realize is that this might only be the first of many years of declining funding if systemic problems in the Michigan budget system are not addressed.

I have parsed through the news to highlight some different arguments and deeper concerns in the Michigan budget. Hopefully, this will give you a clearer insight into the various debates and where we might be headed.

Obviously, all of the local school districts are closely monitoring this budget process. Most surrounding districts are trying to assure parents of a positive outcome in the schools, but the reality is that many are in the same spot as this Crestwood Superintendent:

“We budgeted very conservatively but we cannot sustain a cut of $218 per student without deep cuts to programming mid-year. A $218 cut would reduce our revenue by approximately $750,000 and we would have to absorb it from January to June,” VanValkenburg said.

I spoke with Superintendent Russ Pickell on Friday and he assured me that Flat Rock Community Schools Administration and Board of Education did anticipate some of the worst-case scenarios. And many of the adjustments we saw at the beginning of the 2009-2010 are in anticipation of leaner funding from Lansing in the 2010 State budget.

I am still concerned about the actual cuts hitting the books. As it seems they almost assuredly will.

Preliminary committee budgets continue to contain the $218 per pupil cut to K-12 public education. This cut has been the most contentious of the proposed budget balancing cuts, but still hasn’t left any of the budget proposals to date.

The Michigan Education Association continues to fill the galleries and take their arguments to the editorial pages. Will it be enough?

Here are some of the systemic budget constraints that are being cited as challenges in resolving this budget impasse:

  • Constitutional requirement to pass a “balanced” budget
  • Term limits (contributing to inexperienced leadership and legislators)
  • Proposal A, a 1994 reform dramatically redesigning public school funding

Many are beginning to support the argument that Lansing is simply lacking competent leadership to manage the economic crisis.

This can be a real problem if we as voters simply walk into the polls without carefully considering our decisions about our future representation.

Share

Michigan State Budget Update: Cut $218 Per Pupil

Bill Rice School Board IconAs State lawmakers continue to hammer out budget details to balance a $2.8 billion deficit by October 1, 2009, funding for public schools is taking it on the chin. In its current proposed state the State budget will cut $218 of State funding per student.

Let’s put that into perspective…

Based on student numbers provided by Superintendent Russ Pickell at the September 14, 2009 School Board Meeting (1809 students projected, 1926 first-day attendance) that will be a reduction of $394,362-$419,868 to the Flat Rock School District budget.

Here are some statements from the Detroit Free Press:

Meanwhile, K-12 school administrators were left to wonder how they would cope with a $218 per-pupil funding cut — about $100 more than they were anticipating. Many had already closed schools, laid off staff and slashed programs before the June 30 deadline to have their budgets finalized.

“There’s no putting a happy face on this,” said Frank Ruggirello, spokesman for Plymouth-Canton Community Schools.

Chippewa Valley Schools was already projecting a $4-million deficit by the end of the school year; the cuts announced Wednesday will drive it up to $7 million, said Superintendent Mark Deldin.

“It will be nearly impossible to mitigate the shortfall,” Deldin said.

The cuts approved by a House and Senate conference committee are expected to be felt deeply in K-12 schools.

And similar reactions in The Detroit News:

Don Noble, lobbyist for the Michigan Education Association, said, “The $218 (per pupil) is a big hit … it’s going to mean massive layoffs, reshuffling students, increasing class size and elimination of some programs.”

Unfortunately, this is a reality. These kind of cuts were not anticipated in any Flat Rock District budget projections.

[Update: I had a discussion with Superintendent Pickell this morning (10/2/2009). Apparently my statement: "These kind of cuts were not anticipated in any District budget projections" is NOT correct. The District and Board of Education did consider this more drastic scenario and has, prior to this school year, made some adjustments in anticipation of these cuts.

That's good news! Thanks for the call Superintendent--communication is important, accurate communication is even more important."]

We need to be talking in our Parent Groups, Ram Boosters, and other parent and community groups about what is important for our childrens’ education. We need to set priorities and think of innovative solutions then let them be known to the Board of Education and Flat Rock District administrators.

I plan on being your representative in the hot seat figuring out how to manage through this–so, tell me what you think.

Sign-up for updates via via email and join the Facebook Group.

Share

Innovating Education Funding

Community Service Organizations - Flat Rock, MIWhile the front pages of our newspapers are talking about “green shoots” and “economic recovery” the recession is just now starting to hit our school budgets.

School funding concerns were raised multiple times at the last Flat Rock School Board Meeting. Most notably, shrinking school budgets were cited as the root cause of growing Flat Rock class sizes and might force a future request for more tax payer money from Flat Rock residents (to fund technology maintenance and bus purchases).

In a recent conversation with Superintendent Russ Pickell, at our Rotary Club meeting, I asked what I should be discussing with parents as key issues for the next four years. He didn’t mince words–budgets are going to get tighter and tough decisions are going to have to be made.

He referenced the inconsistent education funding mechanism put in place by Proposal A for Michigan. Basically, all property tax funds go up to Lansing (the State) and are then allocated back down on a per enrolled student basis.

Being a business owner and already working creatively to survive the recession thus far (I have not laid off a single employee) I am not inclined to wait like a victim for the inevitable. I want to look for innovative ways to maintain Flat Rock schools as the envy of surrounding districts.

Although I advocate talking and writing to your State Representatives and Senators about these issues, I am realistic we need to start thinking now about solutions.

Here is one innovative idea happening in neighboring Trenton, MI:

“There is nothing more difficult to deal with these days than public funding. Federal funding, state funding, county funding and local funding are all under the gun. And no matter the discussion, education often is at the top of the list of concerns.”

“The new Trenton Educational Foundation is trying to lend a hand. With public school districts across Michigan (and for that matter, across the nation) facing tough financial burdens with ever-decreasing revenue streams, the TEF was created by civic-minded entrepreneurs to provide learning “enhancements” that aren’t available through traditional funding sources.”

Read the rest of the article. Then please come back and leave your thoughts and comments below.

Share